Civil Service treatment of mental illness exposes a dereliction of duty when it should be showing leadership - Beattie

This Platform piece by Doug Beattie MC MLA, appeared in the Belfast Telegraph on Saturday 16th May 2020. 

"The news that the Health Minister, Robin Swann, is to appoint a Mental Health Champion is extremely welcome and not before time. The position was first proposed by the Ulster Unionist Party nearly 5 years ago, and was greeted with scorn by the then Health Minister who said she was the Health Champion.

If that was the case, she failed spectacularly. Not only has the mental health of Northern Ireland got worse but we have managed to produce policies within the Northern Ireland civil service that discriminate against those suffering mental health illness

Recently I have been working with a member of the Northern Ireland Prison Service (NIPS). Having gone sick with stress, he was subsequently diagnosed as having Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) by a consultant psychiatrist, who is a specialist in mental health care.

This individual fought this debilitating mental health illness in order to return to work -  which he did - and has now resumed his place as a valued member of the workforce.

Reading this you would rightly say well done to that individual having fought to get back to work while he is still suffering from a mental health injury. However, that is not how the Northern Ireland Civil Service Human Resource (NICSHR) unit sees it.

Having returned to work the individual was subject to a return to work interview as you would expect. The interviewer accepted he had PTSD and also accepted that he did all he could to get back to work as early as possible. Yet having taken that into account, the individual was issued a ‘Written Warning’ as part of the NICSHR ‘Inefficiency Absence Policy’.

Like many others I find this a truly incredible outcome. I do wonder if the individual had had cancer, or COVID 19, would he have been subject to a written warning? Indeed, if he had broken a limb would the outcome be the same, or is the written warning being used deliberately as a management tool to stop those with mental illnesses going off sick?.

Due to my concerns I engaged with both the Director General of the Northern Ireland Prison Service (NIPS) and with the Minister for Justice, Naomi Long MLA. Their initial responses were that it was for the NICSHR to decide on written warnings.

I regard this as a genuine dereliction of duty and leadership towards the very workforce you are supposed to be responsible for. It showed a complete misunderstanding of the moral component and functions of leadership.

Having been told to go elsewhere I then engaged with the Head of the Civil Service, the Permanent Secretary of the Department of Finance, and the Director and Head of Employee Relations within the NICSHR. None gave me a satisfactory answer and none were able to get to the core of the issue as explained to them,

For this was not just about an individual, this was about ‘Written Warnings’ being used as a management tool to target those in the Civil Service who suffer mental health injuries/ illnesses/episodes.

The written answers I received from the Human Resources clearly stated that they use the written warning if any department could not ‘sustain that level of absence’. That in itself puts those in the most stressful roles – such as the NI Prison Service - at an immediate disadvantage to those with a less stressful although equally important role elsewhere in the Civil Service.

So let us return to the core of this issue. Would it be acceptable to give a cancer sufferer or someone who was absent due to COVID 19 a ‘Written Warning’? If the answer is no, and I believe that is the right answer, then why is it acceptable to give someone diagnosed with a mental illness a written warning? 

I can only conclude from what I have been told, that the written warning is being used as a tactic to dissuade individuals from going sick with mental health illness. Because if they do, they may find that on their return to work - still battling that illness - they will receive a formal warning that will remain on their records for another 2 years, leaving them even more concerned about taking time off on mental health grounds.

I have now as a last resort written to the Minister of Finance - Conor Murphy MLA - whose department is responsible for the NICSHR. I say as a last resort not because I disagree with his politics, but I have tried to raise this issue on a multitude of platforms with a variety of individuals and received perfunctory answers. Therefore this issue must now be raised by the Minister responsible and that is the Minister for Finance.

If we are serious about dealing with mental health issues then we need to start at the top with Ministers taking issue with existing policies. I’m in no doubt that a Mental Health Champion will help and be able to bring a focus on issues like this, but it is hugely worrying that those who see themselves as our workforce leaders have not already taken issue with such a policy."

News Archives